| Scott McClellan: White House Fed FOX News Talking Points |
|
|
| Written by Steve Young | |
| Saturday, 26 July 2008 | |
|
… and right wing talk show hosts who were invited to the White House for a private meeting with President Bush just prior to the 2006 election are shocked – simply shocked – at the revelation! Steve Young has the details: “There were (FOX) commentators and pundits who were useful to the White House.” Former Bush White House Press Secretary, Scott McClellan, Hardball, July 24, 2008 “I’ve been here from the beginning, and have never seen a White House “talking points.” — And I don’t know anyone else who’s seen one either. I asked senior management if they have ever seen a White House talking points. No one had.” Bill O’Reilly, reacting to Dan Rather’s accusation that FOX News gets White House Talking Points, December 6, 2007. July 26, 2008 – Hollywood (YoungOnPolitics / apj.us) – Talking Point: An idea which may or may not be factual, meant to provide the most effective attack to saturate discourse and frame a debate. When used politically, the purpose is to propagandize by continuous repetition within media outlets until accepted as fact. Similar to how the Communist news outlet, Pravda, and Nazi propaganda chief, Josef Goebbels, offered information to the Folks™, Scott McClellan admitted that Bush White House used Fox commentators as their spokespeople feeding them what the wanted the Folks™ to believe. For those of you not as politically savvy FoxNews viewers, here’s the technical way talking points work: The Bush White House told FOX News what to say and FOX News said it. For example, let’s say the Bush White House wanted to lead the Folks™ to believe that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9-11. They would send a note to FOX News and Fox News in turn would lead the Folks™ to believe he did by reporting it without letting the Folks™ know it was actually a White House talking point. Or…if the Bush White House wanted the Folks™ to believe that Iraq had WMD, they would send a note to FOX News and FOX News would report it without letting the Folks™ know it was actually a White House talking point. Or…if the Bush White House wanted the Folks™ to believe that if you questioned anything about the Bush White House’s approach to their Iraq invasion, you were against the troops. Here’s an example… Bush White House Talking Point: We don’t torture. See. It’s easy. Here…you try it. Bush White House Talking Point: We didn’t lie. Close. You see, sometimes, part of handling a talking point properly, is to not say it’s exactly as it’s written. Let’s see how Bill O’Reilly would have handled it. Bush White House Talking Point: We didn’t lie. See. That’s how a pro handles it. Now, you give it one more try. Bush White House Talking Point: Barack Obama refused to see wounded US troops while in Germany. Wow. You’re good. You could have your own show at FOX. Now Bill might add that if you question his talking point, “you’re a pinhead” or “hate America,” but the White House gives FoxNews guys the latitude to make their (the White House) point more palatable to their particular audience. That’s called “spinning.” Like when you say you’re a “No-Spin Zone” and all you do is spin. In comic circles it’s called satire. At FOX, it’s called “News.” Keep practicing. Who knows? One day, one of those White House talking points will make their way to you and you could be well on your way to a lucrative career at FOX News. Did I get that right, Dana?
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




Steve Young is Webmaster of