Archive
Newswire
Subscribe
Links
Quotes
Letters
Search
Favorite Features!
The Wit and Wisdom (NOT) of Ann Coulter
Paul Wellstone 1944-2002
Investigate September 11th -- must reads
Julie Hiatt Steele's
Report on the Office of Independent Counsel
The 2002 Boycott List
How Al Gore Won In 2000: links to the best coverage

Steve's Talk Radio News of the Day
WHEN CRITICS BECOME THE CRITICIZED
O'Reilly Has Walked in Rather's Shoes
by Steve Young



Steve Young

Dec. 7, 2004 -- HOLLYWOOD (apj.us) -- In 1991 film, "The Doctor," William Hurt played Dr. Jack MacKee, an emotionally-detached physician who, insensitive to the frustration, indignity and heartache of his cancer patients, thought he knew it all. When he discoverers that cancer has invaded his own body, his eyes and heart finally open to the breadth of pain, futility and lack of compassion from the professional in charge, that the patient often endures.

The contrived yet compelling plot point reveals the lesson of the Dylan line (excuse the paraphrasing): "I wish that for just one time you could stand inside my shoes and for that one moment I could be you... then you'd know what a drag it is to see you."

I have long felt that every doctor should be made to see "The Doctor," before ever seeing a live patient. Likewise, it should be mandatory that every radio talk show host should have to suffer the indignity of being the object of their labored charges, toxic labeling and name-calling with little or no consequences, before ever taking their first orchestrated phone call.

This past week, Fox News' prince, Bill O'Reilly, used his weekly column to support Dan Rather and condemn those whose attacks have run ramped since his broadcast of a "60 Minutes" segment that attacked President Bush's military service on the basis of documents whose authenticity had not been fully vetted.

In part, O'Reilly wrote, "The ordeal of Dan Rather... speaks to the presumption of guilt that now rules the day in America. Because of a ruthless and callow media, no citizen, much less one who achieves fame, is given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to allegations or personal attacks."

In Rather's support, O'Reilly argued that critics do not have license "to practice character assassination or deny the presumption of innocence."

Wow... a "Fox News Cable (so-called) Independent" defending an "Elite Network (so-called) Liberal!" That is some kind of an admission coming from pot's own blackness. (Or is it the kettle's?) O'Reilly has often ripped into any number of targets without much a concern for what his sometimes less than accurate charges might produce.

Do O'Reilly's incessant, I-think-thou-dost-protest-too-much claims that he is the object of a multitude of evil, unjust attacks from evil, unjust people make one believe that his paranoia is invalid? Not entirely – and though I believe he does not appreciate his role in the conflicts, I have to also acknowledge that without O'Reilly out there to bang on, my weekly diatribes would probably have to be cut back to once a month.

While I truly believe that a major factor in O'Reilly's indignation comes from his perceived personal affronts to his own character, I'm certainly not willing to give him a pass on allegations that he engaged in sexual harassment or on his own polemics that escalated Al Franken's book sales. Fighting these accusations in court hasn't exactly turned those problems to his favor -- that is, unless you consider silencing payoffs in an effort to check additional expense and further embarrassment as beneficial.

But the act of figuratively becoming the William Hurt neglected cancer patient, as O'Reilly seems to have become, may have worked a small (infinitesimally small) miracle down at "The Factor." Becoming the victim sure tends to adjust one's thinking, especially when it affects numero uno the most. It worked for Rush Limbaugh, who has called for throw-away-the-key incarceration for drug addicts... until he became one. You might even want to throw in his anti-attorney assaults, until he needed one. Unfortunately, his failures of body and soul that necessitate AA-type 12-step solutions (specifically steps 4, 8,9 10 and especially 12) have yet to affect his need to twist the truth he feeds daily to his ditto'd fans.

And so I doubt the O'Reilly, like Limbaugh, will do much to change his attack style as, though he may dismissed by his own "Doctors," this "patient" does not grasp that he is also the "cancer."

Perhaps one day the Lords of Loud will stop rationalizing the harm their divisiveness generates much like a terminal disease spreads toxically through the body politic. Perhaps one day they will become part of the remedy instead of the plague.

And perhaps one day there'll be a cure for cancer.


Steve Young, political editor of National Lampoon and evil genius behind National Lampoon's MoveOnPlease.org, is also the author of "Great Failures of the Extremely Successful" and "Winchell Mink...The Misadventure Begins" (Harper Collins). His "LORDS OF LOUD" column is a regular feature of AlbionMonitor.net.

David Bossie,most liberal senator,Swift Boat Veterans,Swift Boat Veterans for Truth,Eugene Gaudette,Democratic National Convention,Gene Gaudette, Compassionate conservatism,Chris Ruddy,Christopher Ruddy,TrustE,Jeff Koopersmith,Ed Gillespie, fourth most liberal member of the Senate,Unelectable,Herpes,Jerome Corsi,Miserable Failure,Venereal Disease,Stupid,Tammy Bruce
APJ
Super
Search
+ Include Stop-Terms
Sort by Display Case Sensitive Whole Words Only
Search Content
Body Title URL Alt-Text Links Default
Meta-Description Meta-Keywords Meta-Authors
Copyright © 2004, 1996-2003, American Politics Journal Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Read our privacy policy. Contact us.
Operating software by Underwriters Digital Research.
Data development by Gaudette & Associates.
ISSN No. 1523-1690