American















The Gang That Couldn't THINK Straight
Why Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz are the LAST people I'd want to see sending our kids to Iraq
by Tamara Baker

July 27, 2002 -- SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA (APJP) -- Last week on NPR, in the midst of a discussion on the proposed US invasion of Iraq, I heard it mentioned that Joseph Biden has been visiting the White House, urging George W. Bush to think VERY carefully before he tries to go all the way to Baghdad to nail Saddam Hussein. When Bush asked Biden what he was getting at by saying this, Biden responded with words to the effect that, if we went into Baghdad to take out Saddam, we'll be committed to staying in Iraq for the next five years, both as nation-builders and in hunting down the dug-in remnants of Saddam's Republican Guard, an organization which will be well-equipped to destablize any group we try to install as Saddam's replacements.

It's not clear whether invading Iraq simply to take out Saddam Hussein -- a man who Bush the Elder valued because he kept Iran and its ayatollahs preoccupied -- is a good idea.

It's not even clear that Saddam even has the weapons that Bush's people say he does! Scott Ritter, the former UN weapons inspector and registered Republican, has been very vocal lately in saying that this pretext for invading Iraq is utter hogwash.

But what is most definitely clear is that if we are going to do such, then the Bush team had better show more expertise at both nation-building and military strategy than it has heretofore exhibited.

The Bush Junta's woeful efforts at nation-building are shown by the example of Afghanistan.

This is an impoverished nation that has been dealing with one invasion after another for the past three decades. One would think that a Truman-style "Marshall Plan" would help stabilize the country long enough for a good, stable government to develop. But so far, the Bush team's efforts are more along the lines of benign, (or perhaps malignant) neglect -- which is one reason why the French government, among others, is so alarmed at the prospect of Bush invading Iraq: if unior and his team can't even put Afghanistan back together, how will they be able to repair Iraq, which is far bigger and a far tougher repair job?

As for the Bush Junta's military expertise, let's just say that the regular career military people, in both 1990 and 2002, are the ones winning the wars for them. In fact, as referenced in the website suck.com, "Stormin' " Norman Schwarzkopf tactfully yet clearly shows in his book "It Doesn't Take a Hero", civilian chickenhawk Dick Cheney's tenure as Secretary of Defense under the first King George was spent trying to force his generals into doing incredibly stupid things:

...As his mission to defend Saudi Arabia quickly grew into
an offensive plan to drive Iraqi troops out of everyone's
favorite oppressive rococo emirate, Schwarzkopf developed
a four-step course of action intended to grind his enemy
down into miserable fighting condition before finishing him
off with an overwhelming and elaborately staged ground
attack. Problem is, all of that grinding and staging took
time -- and quite a few of the people Schwarzkopf worked
for [wanted him to attack immediately]...

Following one White House meeting at which he'd asked for
more time and more troops, Stormin' Norman reports, Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Colin Powell called to warn the
Desert Storm commander that he was being loudly compared,
by a top administration official, to George McClellan. "My
God," the official supposedly complained. "He's got all the
force he needs. Why won't he just attack?" Schwarzkopf
notes that the unnamed official who'd made the comment "was
a civilian who knew next to nothing about military affairs,
but he'd been watching the Civil War documentary on public
television and was now an expert."

And then, twenty pages later, Schwarzkopf casually drops
the information that he got an inspirational gift from
Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney right before the air war
finally got under way. Cheney was presenting a gift to a
military man, and he chose something with an appropriate
theme: "(A) complete set of videotapes of Ken Burns's PBS
series, The Civil War."

Scary, huh? It gets worse from here:

Having figured out that the general was being too cautious
with his fourth combat command in three decades of
soldiering, Cheney got his staff busy and began presenting
Schwarzkopf with his own ideas about how to fight the
Iraqis: What if we parachute the 82nd Airborne into the
far western part of Iraq, hundreds of miles from Kuwait
and totally cut off from any kind of support, and seize a
couple of missile sites, then line up along the highway
and drive for Baghdad? Schwarzkopf charitably describes
the plan as being "as bad as it could possibly be... But
despite our criticism, the western excursion wouldn't die:
three times in that week alone Powell called with new
variations from Cheney's staff. The most bizarre involved
capturing a town in western Iraq and offering it to Saddam
in exchange for Kuwait." (Throw in a Pete Rose rookie
card?) None of this Walter Mitty posturing especially
surprised Schwarzkopf, who points out that he'd already
known Cheney as "one of the fiercest cold warriors in
Congress."

Consider that Norman Schwarzkopf is a true military man, conditioned to follow orders from the persons who are designated as his superiors, and you'll get an idea of just how cuttingly fierce and damning that criticism coming from him truly is. (Though, come to think about it, Schwartzkopf and McClellan are alike, but not the way Cheney meant it: they both were career military men, unlike the draft-dodging Cheney, and they, also unlike Cheney, cared about what happened to the men under their command, and were loath to spend their lives unless absolutely necessary.)

All of this should make it quite clear that we cannot let Bush's minders go ahead with their war games. (Several people in the Pentagon obviously think so -- the amount of leaking of classified information has escalated recently, to the vocal disgust of Defense Secretary Donald "Darth" Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney's ideological and militaristic twin.)

Here's what we, as citizens, can do:

Call our Congresscritters and ask them to invite Scott Ritter to provide expert testimony as to Iraq's true weapons capabilities. (The Capital switchboard's toll-free number is 1-800-839-5276, and more numbers are mentioned below.)

On Monday, July 29, you can join thousands of people across the country in calling the offices of Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC), Ranking Member of the Foreign Relations Committee.

When you call, ask for -- nay, demand -- fair hearings by ensuring a balanced range of witnesses, including Scott Ritter.

Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE): 202-224-5042
Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC): 202-224-6342

Also, make sure you call Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who sits on the Foreign Relations Committee. (Washington D.C. office: 202-224-3553; Los Angeles office: 213-894-5000; San Francisco office: 415-403-0100.)

Recommendations for witnesses should be sent directly to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The telephone number is 202-224-4651.

Names of witnesses can be faxed to 202-228-1612, attention: Puneet Talwar. The fax should include your address and phone number to assist the committee.

Witnesses who will provide critical perspectives of the Administration's war
plans include:

Richard Falk - Princeton University Professor of International Law
Louis Fisher, Ph.D. - Author and War Powers Expert, Congressional Research Service
Denis Halliday - Former U.N. Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq (1997-1998)
Laith Kubba - Iraqi intellectual, National Endowment for Democracy
Tun Myat - Former U.N. Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq (2000-2002)
Edward Peck - Former Ambassador to Iraq
Scott Ritter - Former UNSCOM Weapons Inspector in Iraq
Hans Von Sponeck - Former U.N. Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq (1998-2000)
Brent Scowcroft - Former U.S. National Security Adviser

You know what to do. Go and do it!


Copyright © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, American Politics Journal Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy. Contact us.
ISSN No. 1523-1690